Arrow Electronics, Inc.

Fundamentals6.2
Price Action6.0
News Sentiment7.0
AI Rating
6.8

Key Drivers

  • Thin Liquidity
  • High Leverage
  • Modest Margins

AI
AI Summary

6.8

ARW now looks more like an earnings-leverage and cyclical recovery story than a plain distributor, as improving Components/ECS demand and AI/cloud-linked activity are driving margin and EPS upside, but elevated debt, tight working capital, and an unfinished leadership transition mean the stock stays a neutral until cash flow and execution prove durable.

EarningsLeverage
Leverage
Execution‍

Price Chart

Loading chart...

Financial Metrics

-
Revenue (TTM)
-
Net Income (TTM)
-
EPS (Q)
-
MCAP

Deep Analysis

Research tool. Not personalized advice.

Fundamental Analysis

6.2

Key Financial Insights:

  • Thin Liquidity
  • High Leverage
  • Modest Margins

ARW remains a low-margin but profitable distributor with a modest valuation, yet high leverage, tight liquidity, and capital intensity continue to cap upside.

LeveragePressure
LowValuation

Price Behavior

6.0
Research tool. Not personalized advice. Technical analysis is for informational purposes only.

Key Price Behavior Insights:

  • Support defense
  • Resistance rejection
  • Volatile range

ARW has a slightly positive but choppy setup over the last month, with buyers defending $202.57 and a clear upside test at $227.67 needed to confirm a stronger trend.

rebound
volatility
Support Level: $202.57
Resistance Level: $227.67

Failed rally near $227-$228 led to a sharp drop to $203.51, highlighting elevated volatility

Sentiment & News

7.0

Key News Insights:

  • Q2 Beat
  • Margin Expansion
  • Valuation Watch

ARW's strong Q2 beat, improving margins, and solid backlog signal continued operating momentum, but valuation concerns, ECS headwinds, and international exposure remain key watchpoints.

Earnings
Valuation

The news is net positive for ARW, supporting upside if demand and backlog strength continue, though shares may stay volatile as investors weigh valuation and segment/geographic risks