Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.

Fundamentals6.0
Price Action4.0
News Sentiment4.0
AI Rating
5.0

Key Drivers

  • Stable margins
  • Strong liquidity
  • Dividend strain

AI
AI Summary

5.0

CHT should be treated as a stable, cash-generating telecom rather than a growth story, and with margins and liquidity holding up but dividends already exceeding earnings and the stock trading at a demanding 27.6x P/E, the key question is whether this defensive stability is enough to justify the current valuation or whether upside is already priced in.

Valuation
DividendRisk
CashFlow‍

Price Chart

Loading chart...

Financial Metrics

-
Revenue (TTM)
-
Net Income (TTM)
-
EPS (Q)
-
MCAP

Deep Analysis

Research tool. Not personalized advice.

Fundamental Analysis

6.0

Key Financial Insights:

  • Stable margins
  • Strong liquidity
  • Dividend strain

CHT shows stable margins, solid free cash flow, and a strong balance sheet, but its rich valuation and dividend payout above earnings limit upside.

cashflow
valuation

Price Behavior

4.0
Research tool. Not personalized advice. Technical analysis is for informational purposes only.

Key Price Behavior Insights:

  • Repeated support
  • Lower highs
  • Overhead resistance

CHT looks technically fragile, with repeated support at $44.0–$44.5 but lower highs and stalled rallies around $45.5–$46.3, making $44.0 the key downside level and a move back above $45.5 the main improvement signal.

CHT
bearish
Support Level: $44.0-$44.5
Resistance Level: $45.5-$46.3

After peaking at $46.27 on 2026-06-16, the stock faded back to $44.00 by month-end, signaling weakening momentum

Sentiment & News

4.0

Key News Insights:

  • Relative valuation
  • Telecom comparison
  • No catalysts

Chunghwa (CHT) was highlighted in a valuation comparison with Telecom Italia (TIIAY), signaling a neutral, price-focused discussion rather than any company-specific catalyst.

valuation

The headline is likely neutral for CHT, as it adds little fundamental change and mainly frames the stock within a broader value-investor comparison