Sanmina Corporation

Fundamentals7.0
Price Action6.0
News Sentiment7.0
AI Rating
7.0

Key Drivers

  • Strong cash flow
  • Rising leverage
  • Modest margins

AI
AI Summary

7.0

SANM should now be viewed less as a steady EMS name and more as an AI infrastructure manufacturing beneficiary, with real upside from AI/cloud and ZT Systems-driven margin expansion, but the stock remains a high-execution-risk trade given rising inventory, new net debt, and a valuation that already prices in much of the growth.

AIGrowth
ExecutionRisk
Valuation‍

Price Chart

Loading chart...

Financial Metrics

-
Revenue (TTM)
-
Net Income (TTM)
-
EPS (Q)
-
MCAP

Deep Analysis

Research tool. Not personalized advice.

Fundamental Analysis

7.0

Key Financial Insights:

  • Strong cash flow
  • Rising leverage
  • Modest margins

SANM delivered steady low-to-mid-margin profitability and strong cash conversion, but rising leverage and a fairly rich valuation make the investment case depend more on cash-flow resilience than on exceptional returns.

cashflow
leverage

Price Behavior

6.0
Research tool. Not personalized advice. Technical analysis is for informational purposes only.

Key Price Behavior Insights:

  • Higher Lows
  • Support Holding
  • Resistance Overhead

Over the last month, SANM has rebounded about 29% from its late-July selloff, improving short-term momentum above support near $200, but it still faces resistance around $218-$219 and elevated volatility.

Recovery
Resistance
Support Level: $202-$200
Resistance Level: $218-$219

Sharp drop from above $219 to the mid-$160s, then a swift rebound

Sentiment & News

7.0

Key News Insights:

  • AI demand
  • ZT integration
  • Margin expansion

Sanmina's beat-and-raise Q3, driven by AI/cloud demand and ZT Systems integration, boosted growth and margins but also fueled sharp share volatility as valuation concerns persist.

AIInfrastructure
ValuationWatch

The news is supportive for SANM's longer-term growth and profitability outlook, but near-term upside may remain limited by volatility and valuation debate