Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.

Fundamentals8.0
Price Action6.5
News Sentiment6.0
AI Rating
6.8

Key Drivers

  • Strong Cash Flow
  • Leverage Risk
  • Premium Valuation

AI
AI Summary

6.8

WMS now looks less like a simple cyclical and more like a high-quality cash generator with improving guidance, but with the stock already re-rated and near resistance, the key takeaway is that upside now depends on continued execution and margin resilience in a still-uneven demand backdrop.

Quality
Valuation
Cyclicals‍

Price Chart

Loading chart...

Financial Metrics

-
Revenue (TTM)
-
Net Income (TTM)
-
EPS (Q)
-
MCAP

Deep Analysis

Research tool. Not personalized advice.

Fundamental Analysis

8.0

Key Financial Insights:

  • Strong Cash Flow
  • Leverage Risk
  • Premium Valuation

WMS delivered strong annual profitability, cash flow, and liquidity, but higher leverage, a heavy intangible asset base, and a premium valuation temper the investment case amid weaker quarterly margins and cash flow.

profitable
overvalued

Price Behavior

6.5
Research tool. Not personalized advice. Technical analysis is for informational purposes only.

Key Price Behavior Insights:

  • Higher highs
  • Support defense
  • Near-term overbought

WMS has trended steadily higher over the last month, with buyers defending the $140 area and the short-term trend staying constructive as long as it holds $150–$151, though the stock is now near resistance and may need a pause.

bullish
trend
Support Level: $150–$151
Resistance Level: $156.96

Strong bounce from the $140–$141 zone and a sharp push to a new short-term high near $156.96

Sentiment & News

6.0

Key News Insights:

  • Growth driver
  • Innovation focus
  • Rating split

Advanced Drainage Systems drew most of the WMS-related attention on strong growth and innovation messaging, but the stock also faced a bearish Zacks downgrade, signaling a split outlook.

WaterManagement
MixedSignals

The news flow is supportive for long-term demand themes, but near-term sentiment may stay volatile due to conflicting analyst views